Role of Electoral College

Having won the Revolutionary War, the thirteen original colonies sent representatives to Philadelphia to figure out what kind of judicature the newly born country was to have. Direct representation was the prefer choice of some of the members of the constitutive(a) Convention, given that "New York and mammy had sh accept that an election by the people at large was both a convenient and a successful mode" (Wilmerding 10). If the chairman were to be the guardian of the people, then he should be constitute by the people. There were two main problems to direct election, as the delegates at the convention saw it. Firstly, the people in to each one state would most likely vote for a citizen of their own state, giving the larger states a heightened chance of dominating the election. And secondly, and mayhap more importantly, "the right of suffrage was much more diffusive in the Northern than the gray states" and of course the Black universe in the South was non allowed to vote. It was thought that because of these reasons, if the newly organise get together States selected their prexy through direct election that the two largest Northern states, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, would have an unfair advantage (Wilmerding, 10-14).

It was this Southern objection to the direct election of the chairwoman that led to the organization of the Electoral College. Indeed, "if each state were to be ass

Zeidenstein, Harvey, (1973). Direct Election of the President, Toronto: D.C. Heath and Company.

Thus, the 2000 election has brought to idle the massive deficiencies in the Electoral College. It is indeed shameful that the world's premiere democracy uses such an undemocratic corpse to elect its highest officer. And it is a disgraceful irony that the United States still uses a system to elect its President that was born from the Nation's darkest stain: the institution of slavery. It is eon to once and for all abolish the Electoral College and bring the United States into the twenty-first century. The technology exists to provide direct election of the President using an instant run-off to determine a winner with a mandate of over half the votes cast.

Instead, the United States labors under a dangerously anachronistic system that not only confuses the middling American but makes the United States the laughing stock of the world. If we atomic number 18 to consider ourselves a Democracy, we need to do away with the occurrent emphasis on states' rights and focus on the individual leave behind of each and every voter.

It seems clear looking back upon the Constitutional Convention through the lens of history that the founding fathers did not have faith in the average man's ability to key out what was best for him, and thus they placed an unwieldy obstacle in his way. The Electoral College in effect takes the power to elect the President away from the masses and bestows it upon each state's political machinery. And although it is straight that many an(prenominal) of the founding fathers believed that the people had the power to elect the President, it is nevertheless true as well that their power of election is indirect at best. Thus, it is important to understand that from the very beginning, the Electoral College was a politically expedient method of electing the President so that the smaller southern states would have an equal say in the process.

A mathematical solution to the problems of run
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!