Socrates on why Death is a Blessing

Plato?s Apology discusses the ladder of a philosopher from A past(prenominal)s named Socrates. During the run Socrates is accused of rejecting the gods of the city and creating his own, as tumefy(p) as vitiate the youth of Athens. He unsuccessfully attempts to persuade the jury of his innocence, and is bestowed a finding of fact of ?guilty.? In response to the jury?s decision, Socrates attempts to expand why wipeout should be considered a blessing. I go away(p) betoken that although Socrates presents possibilities that might await one after demolition, he does not exhaust all of these possibilities. Additionally, I will betoken that the theories Socrates claims await after close cannot necessarily be considered blessings. To furnish these points, I will explain the argument and go on to show counterexamples which demonstrate the flaws in Socrates? argument. Last of all I will show that although the argument presented by Socrates may confuse its shortcomings , it is ultimately a crucial step for Socrates in preserving his grievance and validating his life goals. Upon receiving his verdict of ?guilty? and being sentenced to decease, Socrates presents a speech to show why one should not affright death. He explains to the jurors they have helped him become a martyr and shows them how death will be a positive thing.

?What has happened to me may well be a good thing, and those of us who believe death to be an evil are certainly mistaken? (Apology 40b). Socrates then goes even farther and argues why death is a blessing, as death must consist of one of two things: ? both (prenominal) the dead are nothing and have n! o experience of anything, or it is, as we are told, a chance and a relocating for the soul from here to another place.? He argues ?if it is complete neediness of perception, like... If you essential to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper