Should Medicaid Pay for Abortion

Should Medicaid pay for abortion? This is a very touchy dependent and nonp atomic number 18il that has been in the newspapers for months now. It is also the main(prenominal) reason that the passing of the historic wellness was postponed for the amount of measure that it was. I forecast that even though abortion is a touchy subject and won that has been a main topic since Roe vs. walk in 1973, I consider that is a very important topic and one that volition always be discussed for more more time. I think that abortion should be legal and be the decision of the parties involved to let the decision on whether to get hold of one or non.Also, I conceive think that abortion should be c all over by the tax payers in the case o spoil or incest beca procedure both of those instances could result in a very tough sprightliness for the baby. Either the child willing be hated by its m another(prenominal) because every day she looks at him/her it reminds her of her rapist, or the c hild is born with birth defects. To thoroughly invite a good decision on where you stand with the abortion topic, I think that you must first find issue what abortion actu wholey is.Abortion is the bring on termination of a pregnancy with destruction of the embryo or fetus, all of various purposes resulting in the termination of a pregnancy, cessation of normal growth, particularly of an organ or other body part, prior to full increase or maturation, and the premature ending or abandonment of an belowtaking. Abortion procedures accept manual vacuum aspiration and dilation and suction curettage, both of which chamberpot be performed in early pregnancy.The cordial acceptability of abortion as a means of population control has varied from time to time and organise to place through with(predicate)out history. It was app atomic number 18ntly a common order of family limitation in the Greco-Roman world, precisely Christian theologians early and vehemently condemned it. It b ecame widely accepted in Europe in the middle Ages. intense criminal sanctions to deter abortion became common in the 19th century, but in the 20th century those sanctions were gradually modified in around(a)(prenominal) countries. In the U. S. the 1973 Roe v.Wade decision had the effect of legalizing abortion during the first troika months of pregnancy pronounces were able to implement restrictions on access to abortion by and by the first trimester, though within constraints set by the courts. Since that decision, in that respect has been a fierce debate between supporters and opponents of a liberalized abortion policy. As you memorize this is something that has been debated for centuries upon centuries. I abide read many articals on abortion and how the procedure is actually conducted.The procedure seems to be very gruesome, that is why I nominate understand why some muckle like rep. Bart Stupak atomic number 18 diehard pro-life supporters. If you can recall Bart Stu pak who is a senator from lettuce (our cause state) was the democrat who along with twelve other pro-life democrats held up the passing of the health conduct agitate with his votes until President Obama agreed to sign an administrator order stating that government financing will non go to masking piece abortion in this new health trouble post horse. After speech communication Stupak said We stood strong, said Stupak. We stood on a principle. Stupaks argument authentically goes all the way back to Roe v. Wade. After Roe v. Wade decriminalized abortion in 1973, Medicaid covered abortion care without restriction. In 1976, articulation atomic number 1 Hyde (R-IL) introduced an amendment that later passed to limit federal financial backing for abortion care. potent in 1977, this provision, known as the Hyde Amendment, specifies what abortion services are covered under Medicaid. Over the past two decades, Congress has debated the limited wad under which federal funding fo r abortion should be allowed.For a plan period of time, coverage included cases of rape, incest, life endangerment, and physical health disablement to the woman. However, beginning in 1979, the physical health exception was excluded, and in 1981 rape and incest exceptions were also excluded. In September 1993, Congress rewrote the provision to include Medicaid funding for abortions in cases where the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. The present version of the Hyde Amendment bespeaks coverage of abortion in cases of rape, incest, and life endangerment. The first challenges to the Hyde Amendment came shortly after its implementation.The arrogant Court has held that the Hyde Amendment restrictions are constitutional and that states participating in Medicaid are whole required to cover abortion services for which they receive federal funding rather than all medically necessary abortions. Challenges under state constitutions confound been more successful. Several lawsuits exact been brought in individual states arguing that state constitutions afford greater protection for privacy and equal protection than the federal Constitution. The Hyde Amendment affects only federal spending. states are free to use heir own funds to cover additional abortion services. For example, Hawaii, New York, and Washington have enacted laws funding abortions for health reasons. Other states, such as Maryland, cover abortions for women whose pregnancies are affected by fetal abnormalities or present serious health risks. These expansions are important steps toward ensuring equal access to health care for all women. Prior to the 1993 expansion of the Hyde Amendment, thirty states chose non to use their own Medicaid funds to cover abortions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest.Initially, a number of states express resistance to comply with the expanded Hyde Amendment, and presently thirteen states are under court orders to comply and cover rape and incest in addi tion to life endangerment. Every court that has considered the Hyde Amendments application to a states Medicaid program since 1993 has held that states continuing to move in the Medicaid program must cover abortions resulting from rape or incest in order to be compliant with the Hyde Amendment, regardless of state laws that may be more restrictive. Federal funding has been covering abortion for years and fit in to the Hyde Amendment it covers incest and rape. My research has also led me to see that Michigan is one of cardinal seven states that receive funding under the Hyde Amendment. This means that one of the states that use federal funding for abortion in special cases has the main model that is arguing that exact transcription. This is kind of ironic to me. If the federal funding is there and actually has been there for seventeen years what the point of arguing the bill that will eventually save the government specie.I have found some interesting information that if looked at maybe by some of our politicians they would not cause such a big fuss like Stupak and some other extreme conservatives like Sarah Palin about a the health care bill that not only is in the best interest of the great deal but also the best interest of the government in price of the cypher but also the insurance companies who now will have more policies out there to bring in more revenue. hither are some interesting facts that I found about what event of women have abortions and why. Women with family incomes less than $15,000 recover 28. 7% of all abortions Women with family incomes between $15,000 and $29,999 obtain 19. 5% Women with family incomes between $30,000 and $59,999 obtain 38. 0%Women with family incomes over $60,000 obtain 13. 8%. The reason women have abortion are as follows, 1% of all abortions occur because of rape or incest 6% of abortions occur because of potential health problems regarding either the mother or child, and 93% of all abortions occur for soci al reasons (i. e. he child is unwanted or inconvenient). So why not allow the health care bill to cover abortion? If the bill is basically just going to keep the Hyde Amendment rule in place or maybe take it another step forward and require police reports on alleged rapes and incest it really will not make a difference. If only one percent of all abortion are due to rape or incest, that amount of spending will not even dent the federal funding. I think more money is spent by politicians on their private jets that take all over the United States just to make appearances.While abortion remains perhaps the or so contentious issue in American politics, what is one persons principled stand is anothers crime against humanity. Abortion is a decision that should be made by the person going through the process not some politician from Texas for example who lives in a ten thousand square foot home and makes probably a million dollars a year after kick backs. Also if the system of states cov ering under the correct circumstances has been working for almost 20 years then I say why change it.Many clock people let their emotions and personal feeling make their decisions when all they have do is put themselves in the position of the women who was raped, or the male is out of the picture and the mother will not be able to financially support a child and the child might end up in a dumpster, in the street or living in foster homes its whole life. I look at this way and Im going to state a question to some of these people who think federal funding should not pay for this. Financially verbalise as a nation, Is it financially better to cover a $ergocalciferol dollar procedure once or pay for Medicare, housing, and food for cardinal years?From doing the basic math I think the $500 is a lot cheaper. The United States is a business. And just like any other business it needs money to survive. To maintain that money it has a budget, and that budget at this point is in a major def icit. This bill will save trillions of dollars over the next fifteen years imagine how much more money they could save all states allowed the lower income poverty great women to have abortion under the state insurance, trillions more would be saved. basic math is the key to answering this, in the end its all business.WORK CITED 1. Gregg Cunningham, why ABORTION IS GENOCIDE Winter 2000 2. AMERICAN GOVERNMENT TEXT platter 3. Megan Carpentier, Bart Stupak is no healthcare hero (march 22, 2010) 4. Peter Roff, The Next health care Reform Fight Make the Abortion Executive Order faithfulness (March 24, 2010) Pr 5. Steven Ertelt , New Catholic Bishops Memo Abortion in wellness Care Despite Obama Order (March 30, 2010) 6. Tres Sugar, Congress Debates Whether health Care Should report Abortion (07/09/2009) 7. Angela Blair, Obamas Healthcare Bill Requires All Americans to Pay For Abortions (3/7/2010) 8. The Henry J. Kaiser Foundation, Medicaids Role for Women. Issue instructs An Update on Womens Health policy (November 2004). 9. The Guttmacher Institute, State Funding of Abortion Under Medicaid. State Policies in Brief (June 1, 2005). 2 . American government page 102 3 . www. abortion. com 4 . www. csmonitor. com 5 . The Henry J. Kaiser Foundation, Medicaids Role for Women. Issue Briefs An Update on Womens Health Policy (November 2004). 6 . The Guttmacher Institute, State Funding of Abortion Under Medicaid. State Policies in Brief (June 1, 2005). 7 . www. abortionno. org 8 . www. abortionno. org