Age Discrimination to Faculty

S. Department of bringing up, 2005). In this shell the individual alleging bestride discrimination was led to the employee designated to handle the maintenance of Act and regulations and grievances related to encroachments of the Act or regulations.

The complaint was met with sign reactions that the individual must be mistaken since it is not the polity of the school to discriminate ascribable to old age. In fact the antagonist is true, and exemplified by the habit of numerous instructors on campus that are age 59 years or older. Despite this insistence, the instructor persisted and storied that she was asked her age during an interview. She also demanded to understand why she had been denied employment, if not due to age. She was informed that employment was denied since another candidate was more commensurate than she was. Coincidentally, the employee hired was also younger. This explanation was not deemed satisfactory to the teacher and she stated that she intended to take her complaint to a higher(prenominal) authority (the Department of Education). The meeting continued and the teacher was asked regarding her index to perform certain activities such as those related to computer or technological innovations. The teacher's response showed that her abilities were not adequate for the avocation in question. This was offered as the reason for job denial. Another posit

variety laws affect not yet hiring, promotion, and job security decisions but they also affect salaries, benefits, running(a) environment, and discipline matters (Poskanzer, 2002). ADEA exceptions such as age being a bona fide occupational qualification are not relevant to efficiency since age of the scholar is not a factor in teaching. Factors such as affirmative action play a part in hiring but must not be considered to the point of discrimination. For example the university may attempt to hire a well-rounded faculty, with gender, minority, and different age representation. This may lead to the want to hiring of a younger teacher if the faculty already consists of some(prenominal) older faculties.

However, age discrimination laws prohibit the denial of employment due to age, and affirmative action programs must be "narrowly tailored" and are under "strict scrutiny" by the courts (Poskanzer, 2002, p. 179). For this case it may be understandable that the university sought a younger teacher who would be more able to use up with advanced technology, however to merely discriminate against the teacher pursuit employment due to age was in violation of age discrimination laws. A more appropriate solution would score been to seek an employee with advanced computer skills, which would have prohibited the hiring of this teacher for the correct reasons.

Poskanzer, S. G. (2002). Higher education law: The faculty. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

The Age disagreement Act of 1975 further prohibits age discrimination in programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance. For example the United States Department of Education gives financial assistance to schools, colleges, and universities and these organizations are subject to requirements of this Act. Age Discrimination regulation provides a description of conducts that are in violation of the Act, found in the Code of Federal Regulations. The Office for well-bred Rights enforces these regulations (U
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!